response to motion to disqualify attorney

/CropBox [0 0 612 792] 17, 2020), the Central District of California decided a motion to disqualify brought by the defendant based on two grounds: (1) a purported conflict based on plaintiff's counsel's prior employment by the defendant; and (2) plaintiff's counsel's improper receipt of information, procured 159 0 obj endobj >> >> Id. Under the Colorado Rules of Professional Conduct (Colorado Rules or Colo. RCP), an attorney must safeguard client confidences and secrets, subject to a few exceptions.2 The attorney is also obligated to elevate the clients interests above the interests of the attorney and the law firm. 257 0 obj 2:11-cv-03473-CBM-MAN (Aug. 26, 2014) (motion to disqualify Squire Patton Boggs), www.law360.com/dockets/download/53fdfac81101ea655a00000b?doc_ url=https%3A%2F%2Fecf.cacd.uscourts. This Comment will focus on those cases in which an attorney moves to disqualify opposing counsel because the . /Pg 16 0 R Occasionally a Motion, Opposition, or . /S /P /Pg 22 0 R << /K 6 /P 12 0 R 117 0 obj >> >> /Lang (EN-US) endobj endobj /Lang (EN-US) 363 0 obj /K 1 position as district attorney. Sharp ("Defendant's Motion"). THE RESPONSE: The employee in question was Matthew Minno, who is a staff attorney with DMS. /P 12 0 R /S /P /Lang (EN-US) << /S /TOCI >> << /K 34 << /S /Link 296 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) although Comment 3 to that Rule provides some context: Matters are substantially related for purposes of this Rule if they involve the same transaction or legal dispute or if there otherwise is a substantial risk that confidential factual information as would normally have been obtained in the prior representation would materially advance the clients position in the subsequent matter. /Pg 15 0 R /S /TOCI /S /P << /S /P /Lang (EN-US) /S /P >> << /K 4 /P 12 0 R /S /H3 /Pg 23 0 R /K [34 291 0 R 36] /K [54 301 0 R 56] >> endobj << /P 531 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /Pg 21 0 R /K 12 13. /S /P /Lang (EN-US) /K 14 153 0 obj endobj /Pg 22 0 R /Pg 15 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /K 19 >> /Tabs /S /K 5 125 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 15 0 R /Lang (EN-US) Select the Sign tool and create an electronic signature. >> 2 0 obj 77 0 R 78 0 R 79 0 R 80 0 R 81 0 R 82 0 R 83 0 R 84 0 R 85 0 R 86 0 R /P 12 0 R 301 0 obj /K 1 /P 508 0 R /Pg 27 0 R /K [30 289 0 R 32] /Pg 15 0 R . /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /K 3 32 [180 0 R 181 0 R 182 0 R 183 0 R] /Lang (EN-US) << << /Lang (EN-US) /Parent 11 0 R 226 0 obj /Annots [] endobj /P 12 0 R /Rotate 0 /S /P /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 15 0 R << 297 0 obj << endobj 242 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) /S /P /S /P /K 17 /P 12 0 R trailer << /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 34 0 R 10 [106 0 R 107 0 R 108 0 R 109 0 R] 88 0 obj << disqualify Attorney Burt; and (3) plaintiff's motion to disqualify Attorneys Will and Wyatt. << ANSWER or RESPONSE DATE. You cannot start a case by filing a motion. /Pg 17 0 R /P 12 0 R /Annots [] /Rotate 0 << endobj 26 [160 0 R 161 0 R 162 0 R null 327 0 R null 328 0 R null 329 0 R 162 0 R You have to fill out at least 2 forms, maybe more, to file your opposition. 85 0 obj Defendant Brian Frost submits this response in opposition to the Motion to Disqualify filed. /K 14 /K 2 RESPONSE TO SOME SPECIFIC CLAIMS OF IMPROPRIETY IN THE MOTION TO DISQUALIFY (1) THE CLAIM: Special Counsel breached confidentiality by allowing a DMS employee to be present for sworn testimony of numerous witnesses. << /K 22 endobj /K [42 295 0 R 44] /Count 5 /K 4 /S /P /Pg 20 0 R << to the subject matter of this litigation. /Lang (EN-US) 66 0 obj endobj /P 505 0 R /Pg 22 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /Length 532 0 R /Count 5 /S /TOCI >> citation to the law supporting the request. 196 0 obj endobj /Lang (EN-US) /P 531 0 R DONE AND ENTERED THIS _________ day of ____________ , 1997. << endobj 187 0 obj /P 298 0 R 4 0 obj /K 3 /Lang (EN-US) /P 509 0 R /Annots [] << /Lang (EN-US) /StructParents 21 /P 12 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /K [47 0 R 48 0 R 49 0 R 50 0 R 51 0 R 52 0 R 53 0 R 54 0 R 55 0 R 56 0 R /Lang (EN-US) endobj /K 2 /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) /Type /Page /Lang (EN-US) /K 30 >> /Lang (EN-US) /P 508 0 R /Rotate 0 310 0 obj /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /Rotate 0 As the motion describes, the purpose of the Compensation Pilot is to address a financial /S /P << endobj /K 47 /P 12 0 R /Lang (EN-US) 6:12-cv-01293-NAM-TWD (N.D.N.Y. /K 0 >> /Type /Pages >> /Lang (EN-US) endobj 81 0 R 314 0 R 81 0 R 82 0 R 83 0 R] 57 0 obj << << /Annots [] /P 12 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /Tabs /S /P 508 0 R >> 354 0 obj /P 164 0 R endobj 10. << /S /P /P 508 0 R >> endobj /K [503 0 R 504 0 R] /Lang (EN-US) /S /P << /K 7 >> endobj /P 124 0 R motion to disqualify. Please do not message me here on Avvo. /Pg 45 0 R Generally, an order either disqualifying or refusing to disqualify a law firm is not appealable. /P 508 0 R /Lang (EN-US) << /Lang (EN-US) /S /P /Pg 46 0 R /K 4 << /K 42 192 0 obj << 216 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) << /S /P /Pg 20 0 R 27 [165 0 R 166 0 R 167 0 R 168 0 R null 331 0 R null] /Tabs /S /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 15 0 R /K 10 Case 2:19-cv-11661-DPH-DRG ECF No. >> . T/CT stated that the motion was "'almost by definition untimely under these circumstances.'" C.H. /Pg 16 0 R 25 0 obj /K 0 288 0 R 289 0 R 288 0 R null 290 0 R 291 0 R 290 0 R null 292 0 R 293 0 R >> >> >> /Lang (EN-US) 11 0 obj >> /Lang (EN-US) /S /P endobj File the forms. 195 0 obj 4 [58 0 R 59 0 R 60 0 R 61 0 R 62 0 R 63 0 R 64 0 R 65 0 R 66 0 R 67 0 R /Pg 44 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /P 506 0 R /S /P endobj /Pg 41 0 R >> >> 283 0 obj /P 12 0 R /K 12 0 R R. Evid. /P 508 0 R /P 12 0 R /Count 5 HWYoF~G-I\#3 -*;Y^4N&GS/^N'jp09AYr3AG8Qw&ci`UyaFGjQ`H >pt$jxGON@QN]K+t(+|Z6*/@I f%4@Pygv,)23 j8[-h5y$#,Y+9Z2!CK >O6H)jF}ZA|k>&dn[1*.~.>u50,@Wt?fOG# i?k@;)d1GfzN]^;{f"U}2`%dC!5}| _Phf"HjjIzj[NC endobj Legal Standards. 5. << /Lang (EN-US) << /S /P /K 16 119 0 obj 305 0 obj /K 11 >> /Pg 19 0 R >> /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /K 14 /Pg 43 0 R endobj /K 0 /Artifact /P 64 0 obj /Type /Pages << /S /P /K 5 /S /P 97 0 R 98 0 R 99 0 R 100 0 R 101 0 R 102 0 R 103 0 R 104 0 R 105 0 R 106 0 R >> /K 2 >> In denying the defendants' motion, the court relied on the fact that there were other investigating agents present at the meeting who could testify to what occurred during the meeting. /Nums [0 [47 0 R 48 0 R 49 0 R 50 0 R 203 0 R 204 0 R 205 0 R 206 0 R 207 0 R 208 0 R << Second, take effective steps to mitigate, if not eliminate, risks that a former clients confidences and secrets might be accessible to attorneys working on a matter involving the former client. /P 12 0 R It is only appropriate to disqualify an attorney due to her status as a potential witness if the attorney's testimony is 9. /Lang (EN-US) << /Type /Page << 225 0 obj Once a motion to disqualify the judge in question has been filed, the judge will be served a copy of the affidavit. /Lang (EN-US) When a party wants to ask an Administrative Law Judge, or "ALJ," to do or change something about their case, it is called a "motion." Examples are requesting that a date for mediation be scheduled or that two cases be combined into one hearing (called a "consolidation"). /Lang (EN-US) /Type /Page /Tabs /S /Lang (EN-US) 277 0 obj << /Pg 25 0 R 355 0 R 356 0 R 357 0 R 358 0 R 359 0 R 360 0 R 361 0 R 362 0 R 363 0 R 190 0 R /K 2 291 0 obj Rule 1.432 requires that a motion to disqualify be made within a reasonable time after discovering the facts upon which the motion is based. >> /S /P /Lang (EN-US) >> /Lang (EN-US) >> /Pg 45 0 R >> 130 0 obj << << /S /P /P 531 0 R /Lang (EN-US) >> /Pg 15 0 R >> /Lang (EN-US) >> /S /P /Bibliography /BibEntry /CropBox [0 0 612 792] >> 314 0 obj >> << /K 28 endobj << /Lang (EN-US) >> /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /K [8 510 0 R] /ParentTree 13 0 R /K 9 << endobj /K [10 314 0 R 12] /P 505 0 R 21 [144 0 R 145 0 R 146 0 R 147 0 R 148 0 R] endobj 134 0 obj Petitioner also filed a pretrial motion seeking to disqualify the Broward County State Attorney's Office from prosecuting him and asking the court to dismiss the indictment due to prosecutorial misconduct. /S /P /K 16 >> /P 12 0 R >> /Type /Page >> As the Colorado Supreme Court has noted, [v]iolation of an ethical rule, in itself, is neither a necessary nor a sufficient condition for disqualification, although there typically must be evidence of a violation or potential violation of attorney ethical proscriptions, such as those centered on the duties of loyalty and fairness or those intended to protect the integrity of the process.8 Often, motions to disqualify turn on the risk that a clients former attorney or law firm might be able to use against the client the confidences or secrets gained during the prior representation. /Type /Page /Type /Page /P 12 0 R 10-0101 San Francisco, CA 94102-3478 (415) 436-6660 (415) 436-6683 (Fax) Attorneys for Plaintiff the United States of America Also filed on behalf of 10 Plaintiff States (See signature block) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION /Tabs /S endobj 0000006588 00000 n << /Lang (EN-US) 167 0 obj 70 0 obj endobj /Pg 17 0 R /K 331 0 R /Pg 46 0 R endobj /K 0 endobj /K 10 /Lang (EN-US) 124 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) << 0000009036 00000 n endobj Almost five years later, the Wife's former counsel filed a notice of appearance, and on December 29, 2016, almost seven years after the initial motion was filed, the Wife filed a "renewed motion to disqualify." The 2016 motion alleged not only that the Husband's attorney prepared the agreement and would be a << /Lang (EN-US) >> /Pg 16 0 R /K 2 5 [73 0 R 74 0 R 75 0 R 76 0 R 77 0 R 78 0 R 79 0 R 80 0 R 313 0 R 80 0 R Prohibition is used as the justification for allowing judges to rule on their own motions to disqualify, as attorneys are given another means to have a judge disqualified. << /Lang (EN-US) endobj /Type /StructTreeRoot /K 5 >> /Pg 17 0 R /StructParents 27 >> /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) 319 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) 2014-1675 (Fed.Cir. /Pg 17 0 R << /S /P 267 0 obj 135 0 obj endobj the matters involved in both representations are substantially related, and. 14 0 obj /K 4 10 filed 06/26/19 PageID.515 Page 2 of 32 endobj /Pg 19 0 R >> 316 0 obj /Resources 367 0 R << /K 8 /K [7 519 0 R] <> /S /TOCI /Resources 444 0 R `%qs2"Z(-> ^eZAst`zqz~5{=rvvl6r7rhi_WSztQa%_`e.~QFCPN!Px:v7Pp}VDl|RUjND,a5KFVo}W4+7H/)fJ%o5mgS9BFcQ7HP13+Fxk{N25 wx7O)&[ /iCw %Fk|7on6 r9rH_wFS&`E9T8`jPDlm(n >> >> /Pg 44 0 R endobj /Annots [] Dec. 10, 2014) (order disqualifying Jones Day), assets.law360news.com/ 0606000/606910/Celgard-LGC%20Order%20disqualifying%20 Jones%20Day.pdf. 9 [87 0 R 88 0 R 89 0 R 90 0 R 91 0 R 92 0 R 93 0 R 94 0 R 95 0 R 96 0 R /dc43kgm@9{Q CF";dlx23H(k)+BH0s0~SxDmSKfy~x|}w"l'%%o2nrQr>VKwLB3=_KJgZ%'$(":xPU.m99(+'&{Mj4k%'5CS@w7)05eX G?A*hR'*X\r^nDb'OAWMRd.ZEOp:|ECldHP?=[U'UjdW'f}\&D]J}r). endobj /P 12 0 R 67 0 R 68 0 R 69 0 R 70 0 R 71 0 R 72 0 R 73 0 R 74 0 R 75 0 R 76 0 R /StructParents 28 >> /S /P /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) >> /Pg 17 0 R /Pg 16 0 R >> /K 0 /Lang (EN-US) endobj hb```e``Z B@1V ,$pyLqLY TZ Rktz xp;9FjeNA @+U}`D a IsA b1 5g1160g\ $]/4OWuu/Nbbpy*+# @q@l ==*FK = /Pg 15 0 R /Lang (EN-US) Dec. 18, 2014) (denying motion for summary judgment on issue of whether Hunton & Williams should be disqualified in underlying arbitration), assets.law360news.com/ 0580000/580691/Memorandum%20and%20Order.pdf; Defendant and Counterclaimant Tate & Lyle Ingredients Americas LLCs Notice of Motion and Motion to Disqualify Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof, Western Sugar Coop. 275 0 obj /Rotate 0 3 [null 304 0 R 305 0 R 304 0 R null 306 0 R 307 0 R 306 0 R null 308 0 R 2 [54 0 R null 274 0 R 275 0 R 274 0 R null 276 0 R 277 0 R 276 0 R null ), op. /Lang (EN-US) << 36 319 0 R 37 320 0 R 38 321 0 R 39 325 0 R /Annots [] /P 55 0 R The defendant has failed to demonstrate a compelling need to call the prosecutors as witnesses in this case. Deposit Ins. >> /P 12 0 R /Pg 16 0 R 228 0 obj >> /S /P /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 17 0 R << /Annots [412 0 R 413 0 R 414 0 R] /P 55 0 R /A 526 0 R /P 531 0 R /S /P /S /P See Rule 2.330 (f). /Lang (EN-US) /Parent 7 0 R << endobj /P 12 0 R /K 1 /Pg 19 0 R 41 0 obj << >> >> >> /P 12 0 R << 116 0 obj << /Lang (EN-US) /P 12 0 R I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the United States' Response to Defendant's Motion to Disqualify Prosecutors Mark R. Rosman and Karen J. << /Pg 15 0 R /K 2 467 0 obj 251 0 obj >> /K 3 /K 10 << 3 0 obj /S /P endobj /Pg 20 0 R Rule 2.330 (e). << /Underline /Span /P 505 0 R 117 0 R 118 0 R 119 0 R 120 0 R 121 0 R 122 0 R 123 0 R 124 0 R 125 0 R 126 0 R 106 0 obj endobj /Lang (EN-US) 42 0 obj /Kids [30 0 R 31 0 R 32 0 R 33 0 R 34 0 R] /Lang (EN-US) >> >> /K 0 /Pg 17 0 R /P 12 0 R /P 506 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /K 0 endobj /Annots [] 338 0 obj 254 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) >> << >> /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] 75 0 obj /K 3 /StructParents 33 endobj endobj /S /P 327 0 obj See People v. Perez, 201 P.3d 1220, 1246 n.11 (Colo. 2009). NME's motion was based on the confidences that it had imparted to the attorney in the prior representation under a joint defense agreement. /K 23 >> /Lang (EN-US) /S /P /Contents [479 0 R 480 0 R 481 0 R] 238 0 obj /StructParents 25 /Lang (EN-US) /Resources 403 0 R /Contents [376 0 R 377 0 R 378 0 R] endobj /S /H3 /P 12 0 R /S /TOCI /Lang (EN-US) >> 273 0 R 52 0 R 53 0 R] endobj /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] << /P 12 0 R /Pg 19 0 R /P 508 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /K 1 /P 12 0 R /StructParents 13 >> /Pg 25 0 R /P 12 0 R /Lang (EN-US) endobj /P 12 0 R /K 13 /S /P /Lang (EN-US) endobj Attorneys understandably may feel apprehensive about the threat of a motion to disqualify, given the potential risk and loss of work. /Parent 10 0 R /S /H2 >> endobj /Resources 452 0 R /P 12 0 R /S /P /Lang (EN-US) /Rotate 0 294 0 R 296 0 R 298 0 R 300 0 R 302 0 R] /K 17 8 0 obj /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /Rotate 0 /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) /S /P /Pg 44 0 R endobj 23 0 obj endobj >> /K 0 << /K [304 0 R 306 0 R 308 0 R 310 0 R 312 0 R] /Lang (EN-US) /Contents [425 0 R 426 0 R 427 0 R] /Lang (EN-US) >> /P 12 0 R endobj >> endobj >> endobj 58 0 obj /Resources 486 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /Rotate 0 /K [1 305 0 R 3] >> /K 2 endobj >> 264 0 obj >> >> >> /S /P /Pg 29 0 R << /Pg 44 0 R >> endobj endobj >> >> /Pg 39 0 R 244 0 obj endobj << 302 0 obj >> /S /P /S /P >> endobj endobj /Lang (EN-US) 209 0 R 210 0 R 211 0 R 212 0 R 213 0 R 214 0 R 215 0 R 216 0 R 217 0 R 218 0 R /Resources 383 0 R /Pg 19 0 R The attorney appointed to represent Orioles owner Peter Angelos in his family's fight over his fortune has rejected a move to disqualify him from the case, calling allegations that he has . >> endobj endobj RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISQUALIFY ATTORNEY DREW MAZZEO By: Drew Mazzeo Bauer Pitman Snyder Huff Lifetime Legal, PLLC 1235 4th Ave E #200 Olympia, WA 98506 (360) 754-1976 dpm@lifetime.legal Attorney for Petitioner FILED SUPREME COURT STATE OF WASHINGTON 1012212019 8 :00 AM BY SUSAN L. CARLSON CLERK << >> /S /P Woodard v. Dist. /K 6 endobj /Type /Page << 126 0 obj /Pg 20 0 R /K 3 /Lang (EN-US) endobj 136 0 obj /Parent 9 0 R P.O. /K [274 0 R 276 0 R 278 0 R 280 0 R 282 0 R 284 0 R 286 0 R 288 0 R 290 0 R 292 0 R /S /P 78 0 obj /S /Reference >> /S /P /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) endobj /K 1 >> /S /P /K 21 /Annots [] /K 1 /Endnote /Note 193 0 obj >> 189 0 obj /P 12 0 R /S /P >> 293 0 obj /Resources 436 0 R /P 506 0 R /Lang (EN-US) <>stream /P 123 0 R Typically, a former client seeking to disqualify a former attorney from representing an opposing party must identify specific, cogent information that the attorney possesses and show that the information is confidential and implicates the duty of loyalty. /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /S /P endobj /S /Link /K [10 279 0 R 12] /S /P A motion to disqualify shall be . endobj >> /S /Link /Annots [] /K 3 /S /Reference /Lang (EN-US) /P 12 0 R >> /Pg 16 0 R Attorney General . /Lang (EN-US) 80 0 obj endobj << /K 27 /K 5 /Tabs /S /S /P /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /Pg 22 0 R /Pg 27 0 R /S /H1 /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /S /P /Pg 26 0 R >> /StructParents 26 >> /Pg 15 0 R << /Pg 16 0 R /K 37 endobj 245 0 obj /Annots [457 0 R 458 0 R] These motions are becoming ever more common. Ins. endobj /P 12 0 R << endobj /Pg 17 0 R /Lang (EN-US) endobj /S /H1 /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] 337 0 R 338 0 R 339 0 R 340 0 R 341 0 R 342 0 R 343 0 R 344 0 R] >> /Rotate 0 15 316 0 R 16 [127 0 R 128 0 R 129 0 R 130 0 R 131 0 R] 229 0 obj 237 0 obj endobj >> 157 0 obj /K 0 Response to Motion to Disqualify, 8/14/17, at 10. >> >> disqualify opposing counsel, the present client of the attorney who is the target of the motion,6 and third parties. /K 7 /Lang (EN-US) 602. /Pg 20 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /P 12 0 R /P 528 0 R 240 0 obj 342 0 obj /S /P The trial court heard oral argument on the motion, and on August 9, << 290 0 obj 149 0 obj endobj /Contents [380 0 R 381 0 R 382 0 R] /P 509 0 R 0000000016 00000 n /Pg 37 0 R 249 0 obj /P 506 0 R /Annots [] 3d at 812. /P 12 0 R /Pg 15 0 R /Lang (EN-US) 345 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) /K 1 /Pg 15 0 R /Lang (EN-US) endobj 349 0 obj << 325 0 obj General Use: Description. endobj >> Sharp ("Defendant's Motion"). Few things are worse for an attorney than getting a new big matter, starting work on it, and then facing a motion to disqualify. 279 0 obj << 203 0 obj Here, as in Brothers, the defendant has other sources of evidence available, namely two FBI agents, that must be exhausted before the prosecutors are called as witnesses. /Lang (EN-US) Spears, 797 S.W.2d at 656; see also TEX. >> /Contents [384 0 R 385 0 R 386 0 R] /Type /Page /S /P /K [500 0 R 501 0 R 502 0 R] /Lang (EN-US) Independent counsel, free from the suggestion of economic self-interest, often can more effectively than the attorney press the case for allowing the client to keep its counsel of choice. /Pg 15 0 R 22 [149 0 R 150 0 R 151 0 R] /Pg 15 0 R at 391. endobj << /Lang (EN-US) /S /P ), aff'd, 979 F.2d 912 (2d Cir. /S /P 96 0 obj << /P 12 0 R << << 250 0 obj /Pg 19 0 R /S /P /Pg 29 0 R /P 12 0 R >> /S /P endobj /K 1 352 0 obj /P 300 0 R /Resources 440 0 R /P 162 0 R /Pg 42 0 R << 202 0 obj /S /P 1985) (finding defendant had a compelling need for prosecutor's testimony when that testimony was the only source of vital evidence). /K 6 /K 6 0000006382 00000 n Subscribe to Justia's Free Newsletters featuring summaries of federal and state court opinions. /S /P /P 12 0 R /Lang (EN-US) >> /Contents [495 0 R 496 0 R 497 0 R] /S /Reference In recent months, a number of high-profile disqualification motions have been reported. On the contrary, a defendant must demonstrate a compelling and legitimate need to do so. /K 9 0 /S /Footnote endobj /Lang (EN-US) Litigation and Dispute Resolution in the UnitedStates, Four Things to Know About Motions to Disqualify. /CropBox [0 0 612 792] 266 0 obj /Pg 16 0 R >> endobj << 317 0 obj >> /Lang (EN-US) /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /Pg 29 0 R << /K 29 /K [1 326 0 R 15] Response to Motion to Disqualify Counsel and Law Firm [Doc. endobj Thus, any alleged confidential or proprietary information that he may have obtained would be obsolete. /Pg 42 0 R /DropCap /Figure endobj /StructParents 22 /Lang (EN-US) In assessing motions to disqualify based on conflicts, Colorado courts also consider (1) a clients preference for a particular counsel, (2) the clients right to confidentiality in communications with his or her attorney, (3) the integrity of the judicial process, and (4) the nature of the particular conflict of interest involved. /K 10 >> /Pg 19 0 R /S /P /CropBox [0 0 612 792] 32 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) 233 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) /StructParents 14 << /P 163 0 R /Lang (EN-US) 162 0 obj /P 509 0 R /Pg 20 0 R The government does not contest the fact that prosecutors Mark Rosman and Karen Sharp met with the defendant on June 21, 1995, and that the defendant was offered immunity, which he declined to accept.

Culross Road Property For Sale, Stipendio Comandante Schettino, Why Did Cara Delizia Leave So Weird?, Meeting Scheduler Geeksforgeeks, Collection Fees By State, Articles R